Cases 91 - 100 of 827,537
John Marchisotto v. Juan Sanchez, et al
as 24-1922
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. MARCHISOTTO
Defendant:
JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ, KENT A. JORDAN, MICHAEL A. CHAGARES and others
United States v. Richard Gamblin
as 24-2035
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Richard Blane Gamblin
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
JAMES v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 3:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
DAMON JAMES
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA and BRANCHVILLE INSTITUTION/WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRELL v. PAYNE et al
as 3:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
QUINYATTE JARMAINE HARRELL
Defendant:
PAYNE and ASHLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Austin v. Singing River Health System
as 1:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Lila Austin
Defendant:
Singing River Health System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Gray v. City of Ocean Springs, Mississippi et al
as 1:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Gray
Defendant:
City of Ocean Springs, Mississippi, David Wilder and Cody Gill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Brashier v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas et al
as 3:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Dora Brashier
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Texas, Dearborn National Life Insurance Company and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
McCall v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al
as 2:2024cv02143
Plaintiff:
KERRY MCCALL
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S, NOVO NORDISK NORTH AMERICA OPERATIONS A/S, NOVO NORDISK US HOLDINGS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Celltrion, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant:
Celltrion, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
