Cases 11 - 20 of 48
Pueschner v. Life Care Services, LLC et al
as 0:2018cv02611
Defendant:
Life Care Services, LLC, CRSA/LCS Management, LLC and Waterford Manor Operations, LLC
Plaintiff:
Gordon Pueschner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Duke v. Community Health Connections, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv10294
Defendant:
Community Health Connections, Inc. and Terry F. Osborne II
Plaintiff:
Gordon Duke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Duke v. Comunity Health Connections, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv10294
Defendant:
Comunity Health Connections, Inc. and Terry F. Osborne II
Plaintiff:
Gordon Duke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
McIver v. V.A. United States et al
as 7:2018cv00009
Plaintiff:
Shirley Verrette McIver
Respondent:
Steven W Arle, Daniel Gordon and United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Keith Gordon v. Cenedra Lee, et al
as 17-60826
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEITH A. GORDON
Defendant - Appellee:
CENEDRA D. LEE, DEREK S. DYESS, ERIC L. RUSHING and others
Potts v. Walgreen Co
as 3:2017cv02575
Defendant:
Walgreen Co
Plaintiff:
Gordon Potts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
McIver v. V.A. United States et al
as 4:2017cv01000
Plaintiff:
Shirley Verrette McIver
Defendant:
V.A. United States, Elizabeth Sengstaken, Jennifer Acselrod and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Gordon v. Lee et al
as 3:2017cv00084
Plaintiff:
Keith A. Gordon
Defendant:
Cenedra D. Lee, Derek S. Dyess, Eric L. Rushing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Goodfellow et al v. Camp Netimus, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv01521
Plaintiff:
Gordon Parker Goodfellow, IV , Gordon Parker Goodfellow, III and Lorena Goodfellow
Defendant:
Camp Netimus, Inc. , Candace Kay Lehman and Lisa M Chou (Brass)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Armbruster v. Roosenbloom et al
as 1:2015cv00114
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Clifford Armbruster
Defendant:
William Roosenbloom, Paul Baker, Rose Marie Kuhar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
