Cases 11 - 17 of 17
GASKILL v. HOWARD COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2011cv01486
Defendant:
JOHN AND/OR JANE DOE, HOWARD COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and MARSHALL D. TALBERT
Plaintiff:
BARBARA GASKILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lenig v. Sponaugle et al
as 2:2011cv00186
Plaintiff:
Jeffery A Lenig
Defendant:
Joshua Sponaugle , Oscar Cowen , Jim Gaskill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PENNAVARIA v. WALTON et al
as 2:2010cv00415
Plaintiff:
THOMAS J. PENNAVARIA
Defendant:
JOHN R. WALTON, STEVE CMAR, SGT. RICHARD PLANEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Connie Burns Watkins, et al v. City of Paragould, et al
as 09-3811
Plaintiff - Appellee:
City of Paragould, Arkansas
Third Party Plaintiff - Appellant:
Connie Burns Watkins and Richard Watkins
Third Party Defendant - Appellee:
Mike Gaskill, individually and in his official capacity as Mayor of Paragould, J. D. Stephenson, individually and in his official capacity as Chief of Police of the Paragould Police Department, Todd Stovall, individually and in his official capacity as Captain with the Paragould Police Department and others
Paragould Arkansas, City of v. Watkins et al
as 3:2009cv00172
Counter Defendant:
Paragould Arkansas, City of
Counter Claimant:
Connie Burns Watkins and Richard Watkins
ThirdParty Defendant:
Paragould Arkansas, City of, Mike Gaskill, J D Stephenson and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Connie Burns Watkins and Richard Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
CRINO v. BEGLEY & GASKILL et al
as 2:2007cv04675
Plaintiff:
ROSALINDA O. CRINO
Defendant:
BEGLEY & GASKILL and ROBERT F. GASKILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Goad v. King County et al
as 3:2007cv05118
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Goad
Defendant:
King County, Lee Gaskill and Jane Doe Gaskill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
