Cases 41 - 50 of 65
THOMPSON v. CIESIELSKI et al
as 1:2012cv00375
Defendant:
PAUL CIESIELSKI, DETECTIVE MICHAEL CONDON, DETECTIVE JEAN DEDDISH and others
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burkes et al v. Reed et al
as 1:2011cv03399
Plaintiff:
Elton Burkes , Maury Girard , Scott Haeberlin and others
Defendant:
Kasim Reed , Willie Adams, III , Bennie E. Bridges and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
DEW v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2011cv01226
Plaintiff:
ROBERT DEW
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH , NATHAN HARPER , PAUL DONALDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Condon v. West Des Moines Community School District et al
as 4:2010cv00552
Plaintiff:
Ethel Faust Condon
Defendant:
West Des Moines Community School District and Heartland Area Education Agency 11
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Tomaselli, et al v. Coppola and Coppola, et al
as 10-2312
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GRACEMARIE TOMASELLI and JOYCE TOMASELLI
Defendant - Appellee:
COPPOLA AND COPPOLA, Town Counsel for Land Court, JAMES E. COPPOLA, JR., Town Counsel for Land Court and JUDITH O. TRUFANT, Town Counsel for Land Court
Defendant:
DONALD BEAULIEU, Individually and in official capacity as the Selectman/Sewer Commissioner of the Town of Salisbury and his Predecessors, HENRY RICHENBURG, Individually and in his official capacity as the Selectman/Sewer Commissioner of the Town of Salisbury and his Predecessors, JERRY KLIMA, Individually and in official capacity as Chairman and as the Selectman/Sewer Commissioner of the Town of Salisbury and his Predecessors and others
Arthur Field v. Henry McMaster
as 10-1957
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR M. FIELD, PhD., KATHRYN TAILLON and T. BART KELLEY
Plaintiff:
CAPITAL INVESTMENT FUNDING LLC, Jerry T. Saad, Receiver for Capital Investment Funding LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
HENRY D. MCMASTER, Individually and as Securities Commissioner of South Carolina, WILLIAM JOSEPH CONDON, JR., Individually and as Assistant Securities Commissioner, TOMMY WINDSOR, Individually and as Securities Investigator and others
Mildred Knight v. Episcopal Church of the US
as 10-1947
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MILDRED C. KNIGHT and BOBBY KNIGHT, III
Defendant - Appellee:
EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF THE UNITED STATES, KATHARINE JEFFERTS SCHORI, EPISCOPAL DIOCEASE OF LOWER SOUTH CAROLINA and others
Tomaselli, et al v. Coppola and Coppola, et al
as 10-1745
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GRACEMARIE TOMASELLI and JOYCE TOMASELLI
Defendant:
DONALD BEAULIEU, Individually and in official capacity as the Selectman/Sewer Commissioner of the Town of Salisbury and his Predecessors, HENRY RICHENBURG, Individually and in his official capacity as the Selectman/Sewer Commissioner of the Town of Salisbury and his Predecessors, JERRY KLIMA, Individually and in official capacity as Chairman and as the Selectman/Sewer Commissioner of the Town of Salisbury and his Predecessors and others
Defendant - Appellee:
KOPELMAN AND PAIGE, THOMAS W. MCENANEY and DEBORAH ELIASON, Town Counsel
:
, and
Tomaselli, et al v. Beaulieu, et al
as 10-1598
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GRACEMARIE TOMASELLI and JOYCE TOMASELLI
Defendant:
DONALD BEAULIEU, Individually and in official capacity as the Selectman/Sewer Commissioner of the Town of Salisbury and his Predecessors, HENRY RICHENBURG, Individually and in his official capacity as the Selectman/Sewer Commissioner of the Town of Salisbury and his Predecessors, JERRY KLIMA, Individually and in official capacity as Chairman and as the Selectman/Sewer Commissioner of the Town of Salisbury and his Predecessors and others
Defendant - Appellee:
KOPELMAN AND PAIGE, THOMAS W. MCENANEY and DEBORAH ELIASON, Town Counsel
:
, and
Lynch et al v. Huberman et al
as 1:2010cv01783
Plaintiff:
Deborah Lynch , Josephine Perry , Maureen Callaghan and others
Defendant:
Ron Huberman and Board Of Education Of The City Of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
