Cases 11 - 20 of 1,872
James Anderson, Sr. v. Telfair SP Warden
as 24-11034
Petitioner:
JAMES E. ANDERSON, SR.
Respondent:
TELFAIR SP WARDEN
Kennemore v. Anderson
as 4:2024cv00465
Petitioner:
Daniel Eldon Kennemore
Respondent:
Donna Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunt v. Anderson
as 3:2024cv00202
Petitioner:
Floyd O. Hunt, Jr.
Respondent:
D. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Arviza
as 3:2024cv00477
Petitioner:
James O. Anderson
Respondent:
Warden Arviza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Anderson v. Hayes et al
as 6:2024cv01241
Plaintiff:
Michael Isaiah Anderson, Jr
Defendant:
Loy Hayes, J. Ryan White, Karen Parrott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Hillhouse
as 6:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
Eron Demond Anderson
Respondent:
Botie Hillhouse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez v. Anderson
as 3:2024cv01295
Petitioner:
Carlos Hernandez
Respondent:
Ryan Anderson
Defendant:
Warden Steve Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tillman v. Scott County Sheriff Department et al
as 3:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Tyrus Tillman
Defendant:
Scott County Sheriff Department, Willie Anderson, Mike Lee and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Alan Anderson v. Bryan Burkholz
as 2:2024cv01761
Petitioner:
Alan Anderson
Respondent:
Bryan Burkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
McDavid v. Anderson County, TN et al
as 3:2024cv00088
Petitioner:
Logan McDavid
Respondent:
Anderson County, TN and Anderson County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
