Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Boggs v. Salvant et al
as 4:2019cv00386
Petitioner:
Harry Lee Boggs, Jr.
Respondent:
Sharen Wilson, Thomas A Wilder, Wayne Salvant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hussell et al v. Franklin et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2019cv00101
Respondent:
WV Department of Health and Human Resource Bureau for Children and Families, Katie Franklin, Erica Brannon Gunn and others
Petitioner:
Alayna Hussell and Joseph Hussell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BOGGS v. WARDEN
as 3:2019cv00005
Petitioner:
MATTHEW BOGGS
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BOGGS v. WARDEN
as 3:2019cv00006
Petitioner:
MATTHEW BOGGS
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BOGGS v. WARDEN
as 3:2019cv00007
Petitioner:
MATTHEW BOGGS
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BOGGS v. WARDEN
as 3:2018cv00209
Petitioner:
MATTHEW BOGGS
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Shiflett v. Sabatka-Rine et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 8:2018cv00268
Respondent:
Boggs, PhD A. Carbaugh, C. Connelly and others
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Petitioner:
Nicholas Shiflett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boggs v. Jump
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2018cv00040
Petitioner:
Jason Jerrard Boggs
Respondent:
Neal Jump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BOGGS v. KAUFFMAN et al
as 2:2018cv00154
Petitioner:
ANTHONY BOGGS
Respondent:
KEVIN KAUFFMAN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF CHESTER and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.