Cases 11 - 20 of 418
Milton v. Stover
as 3:2023cv01027
Petitioner:
Kevin Milton
Respondent:
Stover
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Milton Lancaster v. David Millis
as 23-6614
Petitioner / Appellant:
MILTON E. LANCASTER
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID MILLIS
SAMUELS v. KNIGHT
as 1:2023cv03681
Petitioner:
MILTON SAMUELS
Respondent:
WARDEN STEVIE KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dortch v. Jeffreys
as 8:2023cv00262
Petitioner:
Milton B. Dortch, Jr.
Respondent:
Rob Jeffreys
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RAMSEY RANDALL v. (PBPP) PA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, ET AL
as 5:2023cv01389
Petitioner:
RAMSEY RANDALL and ANONYMOUS AND ALSO WESLEY MILTON
Respondent:
(PBPP) PA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, ELLIOT SMEAL, PBPP CHAIR MAN/WOMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Godoy-Ordonez v. Warden MDC Guaynabo
as 3:2023cv01274
Petitioner:
Segundo Milton Godoy-Ordonez
Respondent:
Warden MDC Guaynabo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tarver v. Lumpkin
as 23-10059
Petitioner / Appellant:
Milton Lee Tarver
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Milton v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2023cv00005
Petitioner:
Marcus Milton
Respondent:
USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MERO-VALENCIA v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2023cv00350
Petitioner:
MILTON JAVIER MERO-VALENCIA
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Livas v. Corrections
as 3:2022cv06209
Plaintiff:
Milton L Livas, Jr
Defendant:
LA Dept of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
