Cases 11 - 20 of 55
Brankle v. United States Probation Office et al
as 0:2021cv02528
Petitioner:
David W. Brankle
Respondent:
United States Probation Office, Marc R. Grawe, Paul Ricketts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DAVIS v. UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICER - MDNC
as 1:2021cv00191
Respondent:
UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICER - MDNC
Petitioner:
MATTHEW DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Viola v. United States Probation Office, Cleveland Ohio
as 1:2020cv02194
Petitioner:
Anthony L. Viola
Respondent:
United States Probation Office, Cleveland Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ciacci v. United States Probation Office, District of Hawaii
as 1:2020cv00271
Petitioner:
Michael K. Ciacci
Respondent:
United States Probation Office, District of Hawaii
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ciacci v. United States Probation Office District of Hawaii et al
as 1:2019cv00672
Petitioner:
Michael K. Ciacci
Respondent:
United States Probation Office District of Hawaii and USPO Hawaii Supervision Officer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Ciacci v. United States Probation Office
as 1:2019cv00476
Respondent:
United States Probation Office
Petitioner:
Michael K. Ciacci
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Steiger v. United States Probation Office (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00613
Defendant:
United States Probation Office
Plaintiff:
Bradley Joseph Steiger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Steiger v. Simmons(INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00599
Defendant:
United States Probation Office, Derrick Cunningham and Marcus Simmons
Plaintiff:
Bradley Joseph Steiger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gary Peel v. Barbra Zarrick
as 18-2732
Petitioner - Appellant:
GARY E. PEEL
Respondent - Appellee:
BARBRA ZARRICK, Chief United States Probation Officer for the Southern District of Illinois
Hall v. United States Probation Office
as 4:2017cv00517
Plaintiff:
Karen E Hall
Defendant:
United States Probation Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
