Cases 1 - 10 of 661
Meyers v. Bailey
as 2:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
Warden Mack Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv01015
Petitioner:
Deon Anthony Romell Bailey
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bailey v. Warden, FCI Texarkana
as 5:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
James Robert Bailey
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Texarkana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bailey (PS) v. US Probation Office et al
as 1:2024cv01535
Petitioner:
Darrel Lamont Bailey and Darrell Lamont Bailey
Respondent:
US Probation Office and Governor of Colorado
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bradley v. Parson et al
as 4:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Trey Tarell Bradley
Defendant:
Mike Parson, Andrew Bailey, Brent Teichman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey #361996 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv01118
Petitioner:
Leon Bailey, Jr.
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Borda
as 3:2024cv02307
Petitioner:
Jasper W. Bailey
Respondent:
Warden Ron E. Borda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Warden, FCC Coleman USP 1
as 5:2024cv00197
Petitioner:
Deon Anthony Romell Bailey
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman USP 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bailey v. People of the State of Michigan
as 2:2024cv10486
Petitioner:
Larry James Bailey
Respondent:
People of the State of Michigan
Golden v. Bailey
as 1:2024cv00656
Petitioner:
Randy D. Golden
Respondent:
William Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
