Cases 1 - 10 of 855
Newton v. Fhuere
as 6:2024cv00512
Petitioner:
Sidney Van Newton
Respondent:
Corey Fhuere
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LILLARD v. RULE et al
as 2:2024cv00186
Petitioner:
COREY LILLARD
Respondent:
T. RULE and WADAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Corey Bright v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10833
Petitioner:
COREY Q. BRIGHT
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ezell v. Hamilton
as 24-6085
Petitioner:
JAMES RICKY EZELL, III
Respondent:
COREY DUANE HAMILTON and CASEY HAMILTON
Bullard #093272 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00948
Petitioner:
Jason Corey Bullard
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell, Gerald Thompson and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lombard-Jackson (PS) v. Parker et al
as 1:2024cv00628
Plaintiff:
Kiki Lombard-Jackson
Defendant:
Corey Parker, Brian Hall, Nikea Bland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Delfin v. Fhuere
as 6:2024cv00706
Petitioner:
Jorge Delfin
Respondent:
Corey Fhuere
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Coggins v. Thomas
as 1:2024cv00042
Petitioner:
Corey Blaine Coggins
Respondent:
Michael Thomas
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HARRIS v. SUTTER et al
as 1:2024cv00065
Petitioner:
COREY L. HARRIS, SR.
Respondent:
WARDEN SUTTER and DISTRICT ATTORNEY ERIE COUNTY, PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Reed v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00195
Petitioner:
Corey Stephon Reed
Respondent:
W. Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
