Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Taft et al v. Thomas et al
as 5:2012cv04036
Plaintiff:
David Lynn Taft, Jr, Ryan Paul Peterson and Eddie Risdal
Defendant:
Tracy Thomas, Jason Smith, Mike Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Stapleton v. Public Safety & Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv00823
Plaintiff:
David Lynn Stapleman
Defendant:
Dept of Public Safety & Corrections, Jimmy LeBlanc, Libby Tigner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PECHE v. KELLER et al
as 1:2011cv00249
Plaintiff:
DAVID LYNN PECHE
Defendant:
ALVIN W. KELLER, JR., TODD W. PINION and SHEILA H. FLOWERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payton v. Domingez et al
as 2:2009cv00308
Plaintiff:
David Lynn Payton, II
Defendant:
Roy Domingez, Westville Correctional Center, Christy Waite and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Troup v. Walls et al
as 7:2009cv00117
Plaintiff:
David Lynn Troup
Defendant:
Scott Walls, Richard Pilkington and Dewayne Bankston
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Madera v. Alford et al
as 1:2008cv00731
Defendant:
FNU Alford, Richard P LeBlanc Unit Admin, Nathanial Quartermann and others
Plaintiff:
David Lynn Madera
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
David Hall, Jr. v. Doris Whitmore
as 08-7833
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID LYNN HALL, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DORIS WHITMORE, Human Resouces Manager
David Hall, Jr. v. US Equal Employment Opportunit
as 08-7718
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID LYNN HALL, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
US EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION and VIRGINIA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Hall v. Whitmore
as 7:2008cv00463
Plaintiff:
David Lynn Hall, Jr.
Defendant:
Doris Whitmore
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hall v. US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission et al
as 7:2008cv00343
Plaintiff:
David Lynn Hall, Jr.
Defendant:
US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and Virginia Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
