Cases 71 - 80 of 110
Monk v. Gissels et al
as 2:2013cv02392
Plaintiff:
Justen Kofi Monk
Defendant:
Unknown Gissels, Maricopa County Towers Jail, Mesa, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Monk v. Ray et al
as 3:2013cv00381
Plaintiff:
Jason Charles Monk
Defendant:
David Ray, Tonya West, John Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Everick Monk v. Former Sheriff Foster, et al
as 13-2170
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Everick Lovosier Monk
Defendant - Appellee:
Former Sheriff Foster, Former Captain Truman Young, Lieutenant Janet Delaney and others
Camacho et al v. Graff et al
as 2:2013cv00997
Plaintiff:
Agustin Esparza Camacho and Maria Susana Leon
Defendant:
Cody Graff , Ray Barwick , Monks Corner Police Department, The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Cathey v. Curry et al
as 2:2012cv04115
Plaintiff:
Daveon Lamarnce Cathey
Defendant:
Chris Curry, Monk, Patrick Eugene and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monk v. Collins et al (TVV)
as 3:2012cv00542
Plaintiff:
Jason Charles Monk
Defendant:
John Collins, Tonya West, David Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monk v. Foster, et al
as 1:2011cv01054
Plaintiff:
Everick L. Monk
Defendant:
Sheriff Foster, Truman Young, Janet Delaney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montgomery v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2011cv00757
Plaintiff:
Marshall Montgomery
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Kim Tobias Thomas, J. C. Giles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Knox v. Sockey, et al
as 11-7054
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONE L. KNOX
Defendant - Appellee:
W.A. SOCKEY, Dentist, AMANDA WORKMAN, Dental Assistant, CHESTER MASON, Health Service Administrator and others
Rhodes v. Monk
as 7:2011cv00366
Defendant:
Monk
Plaintiff:
Paul Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
