Cases 1 - 10 of 1,099
Brandon Crosby v. Larry Collins
as 24-6441
Plaintiff:
BRANDON LUIS CROSBY
Defendant:
LARRY COLLINS, Unit Manager of C-Building, DAVID ROBINSON, Chief of Correctional Operations for Virginia Department of Corrections, RANDALL MATHENA, Director of Security and Correction Enforcement for Virginia Department of Corrections and others
Cook v. Burke et al
as 4:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Marcus Cook
Defendant:
Mr. Burke and Mr. John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Burke
as 0:2024cv01409
Plaintiff:
Paul Vincent Price
Defendant:
George J. Burke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aguirre v. Securus Technology et al
as 6:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Arnold Aguirre
Defendant:
Securus Technology, Ariel Burks, Unknown Pharr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnold Burk v. Catoosa County Superior Court
as 24-11170
Plaintiff:
ARNOLD CORDELL BURK
Defendant:
CATOOSA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Crosby v. Collins et al
as 7:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Brandon L. Crosby
Defendant:
Larry Collins, David Robinson, Randall Mathena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burke v. Payne et al
as 9:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
James Alan Burke, Jr.
Defendant:
James Payne, Karren Price, LeAnn Rafferty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burke v. Nowels et al
as 2:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
James Thomas Burke
Defendant:
John T Nowels, State of Washington Attorney General and Spokane County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McNeil v. Watts et al
as 3:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
Mickel McNeil and Mickel J. McNeil
Defendant:
Watts, G- Lewis, Farley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burke v. Mundin
as 24-20103
Plaintiff:
Andrew Burke
Defendant:
Joann Mundin, Dawn Simmons, Nurse Practitioner, Lieutenant Reiser and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
