Cases 11 - 20 of 152
DUDLEY v. PROGRAM REVIEW COMMITTEE (PRC, ET AL
as 3:2022cv00170
Plaintiff:
CLINTON DEONARD DUDLEY
Defendant:
PROGRAM REVIEW COMMITTEE (PRC), CONSELOR SMICK, CONSELOR FOX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Craven County et al
as 5:2022ct03360
Plaintiff:
Sharif Hakim Moore
Defendant:
Craven County, Jones County, City of New Bern and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRINTUP v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00380
Plaintiff:
DARIUS PRINTUP
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, K. VINARDI, CHRISTOPHER HOLCOMB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DENNING v. WALKER et al
as 2:2022cv00370
Plaintiff:
JAMES DENNING
Defendant:
WALKER, REED, RIORDAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Virgil Green v. M. Smith, et al
as 22-1633
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VIRGIL R. GREEN
Defendant / Appellee:
M. SMITH, Custody Officer for MSI Garment Factory, D. PELLER, Classification Director and S. THOMPSON, RUM
PRINTUP v. SMITH et al
as 2:2022cv00309
Plaintiff:
DARIUS PRINTUP
Defendant:
M. SMITH, JR., C. WAINMAN, J. JOBE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OAKLEY v. SMITH
as 3:2022cv00126
Plaintiff:
CODY OAKLEY
Defendant:
CHRISTAN M SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields #257135 v. Smith et al
as 2:2022cv01234
Plaintiff:
Handson Eugene Fields, Jr.
Defendant:
Cody M Smith and Shawn A Caziarc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terry v. Watson et al
as 2:2022cv00111
Plaintiff:
Jarell D Terry
Defendant:
Levy Watson, Cameron Moore, Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Virgil Green v. M. Smith, et al
as 22-1658
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VIRGIL R. GREEN
Defendant / Appellee:
M. SMITH, Custody Officer for MSI Garment Factory, D. PELLER, Classification Director and S. THOMPSON, RUM
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
