Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Ridley v. Dart et al
as 1:2015cv11167
Plaintiff:
Brian Ridley
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Anita Jonas, Robert R Simon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 9:2015cv03989
Plaintiff:
Altony Brooks
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Lee Correctional, Major Stephone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glidewell v. Martin
as 3:2015cv00003
Plaintiff:
Jonas Glidewell
Defendant:
Joey Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Dirig v. William Wilson, et al
as 14-3093
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER DIRIG
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM K. WILSON, Superintendent, TINA HILL, WILLIAM AUBIN, Officer and others
Ingram v. Jonas et al
as 5:2013ct03191
Plaintiff:
Ellsworth Anthony Ingram
Defendant:
Nysikia Jonas, Joyce Kornegay and Donald Mobley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen et al v. Rednour et al
as 3:2013cv00851
Plaintiff:
Anthony Allen, Darren Henderson, Derrick Parks and others
Defendant:
David A Rednour, Richard Harrington, Shannis Stock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MATHIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 5:2012cv00475
Plaintiff:
JONAS MATHIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Alford et al
as 2:2012cv01756
Plaintiff:
Matthew Delashawn Carter
Defendant:
Jonas Alford, Ritchie Miller, Red Rock Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carmichael v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 2:2012cv13594
Plaintiff:
Karlos Carmichael
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Nick Ludwick, Scott L Holmes and others
McCune v. Broadus et al
as 1:2011cv00322
Plaintiff:
Calvin McCune
Defendant:
Ken Broadus, Unknown Bates and Unknown Jona
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
