Cases 31 - 40 of 249
Moore v. Unknown Defendant
as 5:2021ct03304
Plaintiff:
Larry Brandon Moore
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant, State of North Carolina, NC Department of Public Safety and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aills v. Bludworth et al
as 4:2021cv00090
Petitioner:
John Aills
Respondent:
Peter Bludworth, Danny York, Hearings Officer Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hamlett v. Everly et al
as 7:2021cv06663
Plaintiff:
John Hamlett
Defendant:
C.O. Taj K. Everly, C.O. Christopher J. Dillon, C.O. Gary J. Perrotta, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
INGRAM v. SCI SMITHFIELD, et al
as 2:2021cv00359
Defendant:
SCI SMITHFIELD UNIT MANAGER RUNK, DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF PAROLE KIRK C. LOOSI, C. GORMAN and others
Plaintiff:
KAI D. INGRAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Everett v. Waddle et al
as 3:2020cv00184
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Faust, Does Disciplinary Hearing Officer and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Everett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Genao v. City of New York et al
as 1:2020cv04872
Defendant:
IG Officer Bertdli, OSIU Dept. Guidy, Mr. B. and others
Plaintiff:
Gabino Genao
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander v. Marshall et al
as 4:2020cv01214
Defendant:
Grievance Chief Mr. Anderson, D.H.O. Hearing Officer Ms. Barker, Lt. Moss and others
Plaintiff:
James Walter Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHAVIS v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2020cv01441
Defendant:
WETZEL, DIRECTOR OF PRISON HEALTH SERVICE UNIT, S.C.I. WAYMART, U.M. KAY and others
Plaintiff:
CHAVIS and RONALD CHAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henslee v. Stoppell et al
as 5:2019ct03369
Defendant:
Disciplinary Hearing Officer, Sgt. Mansphit, Sgt. Stoppell and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Henslee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watts v. Penalleton
as 5:2019cv00122
Plaintiff:
Carl Watts
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Hearing Officer S. Penalleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
