Cases 31 - 40 of 757
Dida v. Hvarre
as 1:2024cv01032
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Dida
Defendant:
Kimberly Hvarre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dida v. Hvarre
as 1:2024cv01033
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Dida
Defendant:
Kimberly Hvarre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Pike County Mississippi et al
as 5:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Landon Earl Thomas
Defendant:
Pike County Mississippi, Sheriff James Brumfield, Captain Richard Bynam and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Noward v. State of Illinois et al
as 2:2024cv02013
Plaintiff:
Justin Noward
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Kimberly Huarre, . Dilg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rotondo v. Salisbury, et al
as 24-1006
Plaintiff:
GINO ROTONDO, SR.
Defendant:
WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., individial capacity, KIMBERLY KANE, individial capacity, LORI VENTITUOLO, individial capacity and others
Anderson v. Reep et al
as 1:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
Albert Anderson
Defendant:
FNU Reep, Doug Newton, Foothills Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Parker et al
as 3:2023cv03053
Plaintiff:
Dylan Jay Baker
Defendant:
Hattie Parker, Jim Henry and Kimberly Lupinacci
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CALLANTINE v. CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00559
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY W. CALLANTINE
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC, ELIZABETH BENNETT, SAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Wills et al
as 3:2023cv03823
Plaintiff:
Christopher Johnson
Defendant:
Anthony D. Wills and Kimberly Weitl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanley v. Precythe et al
as 2:2023cv04223
Plaintiff:
Dairian Eugene Stanley
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Travis Terry, Doris Falkenrath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
