Cases 51 - 60 of 114
JACKSON v. MONK et al
as 2:2019cv00171
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, HERITAGE TRAILS CORRECTIONAL, DANIEL L. CONN and others
Plaintiff:
QUINTIN D. JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Palmer v. Beverly et al
as 3:2019cv03016
Defendant:
Parole Officer Nick Mayfield, Beverly and Jodi Higgins
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Emerson Earl Palmer, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NORRIS et al v. EMERSON et al
as 1:2019cv00495
Plaintiff:
COURTNEY SHAWN NORRIS, JOHN DOE 1 and DEREK ANTHONY ANDERSON
Defendant:
JESSE EMERSON, ANDRE MIKSHA, PAUL KAUSHALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Martinez
as 1:2019cv00221
Defendant:
Martinez
Plaintiff:
Darnell Emerson Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ewing v. Burke, et al.
as 5:2018cv00117
Plaintiff:
Ricky Ronnell Ewing
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Dr. J. Burke and M. Emerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lloyd Emerson Earl Palmer, II v. Doe Administrator et al
as 4:2018cv04141
Defendant:
John Doe Administrator and Rodderick Dunn
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Emerson Earl Palmer, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Palmer v. Franklin et al
as 4:2018cv04140
Defendant:
John Doe Administrator, Rodderick Dunn, Mrs. Scoggins and others
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Emerson Earl Palmer, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
West v. The GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 5:2018ct03230
Defendant:
Rivers Correctional Institution and The GEO Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gary Emerson West
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sloan v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2018cv00426
Defendant:
Juli Roberts, Unknown Parties, Arizona Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Emerson Sloan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MONDAY v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2018cv02387
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DONALD EMERSON, HERITAGE TRAILS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID EUGENE MONDAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
