Cases 61 - 70 of 801
Hill v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv01201
Plaintiff:
Adam Hill
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, William Straughn, Dale Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. SPAGEL et al
as 1:2022cv00334
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL B. WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant:
EDWARD SPAGEL, OFFICER PETER DREGALLA, BALESK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MONNOT v. KNIGHT
as 1:2022cv02039
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY ROBERT MONNOT
Defendant:
WENDY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HATCHER v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2022cv01944
Plaintiff:
JESSIE HATCHER
Defendant:
WENDY KNIGHT, RANSOM, A. RICHEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. Nobles et al
as 2:2022cv00132
Plaintiff:
Steven Michael Knight
Defendant:
Sheriff Mitch Nobles, Danny Meritt, Allen Crocker and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. Elko County et al
as 3:2022cv00433
Plaintiff:
Wade Alan Knight
Defendant:
Elko County, Aitor Narvaiza, Lt Adrian Parry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. KNIGHT et al
as 3:2022cv18500
Plaintiff:
ALBERT JOHNSON JR and ALBERT JOHNSON, JR
Defendant:
K KNIGHT and L HICKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. Picken Co. Det. Cnt
as 8:2022cv03173
Plaintiff:
Gary Rowland Knight
Defendant:
Picken Co. Det. Cnt, Pickens County Detention Center and Ms. Makayla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Paul Johnson v. A. Cuevas, et al
as 22-16394
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
A. CUEVAS, RON DAVIS, T. ALLEN and others
GIBSON v. MACON STATE PRISON et al
as 5:2022cv00338
Plaintiff:
ARMOND GIBSON
Defendant:
MACON STATE PRISON, WARDEN TARMASHE SMITH, TIMOTHY SALES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
