Cases 1 - 10 of 3,172
Mangru v. Larangeira
as 1:2024cv00382
Plaintiff:
Andrew Mangru
Defendant:
David Larangeira
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WASHINGTON v. ANDREWS et al
as 3:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
MARLO WASHINGTON
Defendant:
R HILL, C ANDREWS and ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramon Alvarado, Jr. v. Brian Foster, et al
as 24-2257
Defendant:
BRAD HOMPE, BRIAN FOSTER, Warden, JAMES MUENCHOW and others
Plaintiff:
RAMON ALVARADO, JR.
HUFFMAN v. C. LARGE et al
as 7:2024cv00636
Defendant:
Dr. Shah and NURSE PRACTITIONER C. LARGE
Plaintiff:
Jullian Andrew Huffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill #793484 v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv00961
Defendant:
Ronald Fenner, Kristopher W. Spaulding, Unknown Parties and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan M. Hill #793484
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nash v. McFarlane et al
as 3:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Nash
Defendant:
Andrew McFarlane, Sgt. Moore, Cert Officer Garner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WELLS v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2024cv01239
Defendant:
CHARLIE FOX, ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES LLC., ANDREW COLE and others
Plaintiff:
ANDRE WELLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andrews #612980 v. Ward et al
as 1:2024cv00752
Defendant:
Unknown Smith, Unknown Gregory, Unknown Burkett and others
Plaintiff:
Michael James Andrews #612980
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Warden et al
as 5:2024cv00495
Defendant:
Warden, Nurse Angela Hannah, PA-C Joe Cooper and others
Plaintiff:
Alberto Sibrian Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Wakefield v. Scoble et al
as 3:2024cv02150
Defendant:
Dr. Ibraheim, Sue Mason, Megan Duiguid and others
Plaintiff:
Eric L. Wakefield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
