Cases 1 - 10 of 11
FANN v. HARRY et al
as 2:2024cv00766
Plaintiff:
GREGORY D. FANN, Jr.
Defendant:
Dr LAUREL R. HARRY, ERIC ARMEL, TINA WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Precythe et al
as 6:2022cv03164
Plaintiff:
Jared Williams, Anthony Zarro, Antonio West and others
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Anna Boyles, Joan Reinkemeyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Price et al
as 3:2019cv00038
Defendant:
FNU Fann, Lieutenant FNU Carr, Sergeant FNU Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
Troy Delmar Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Carter et al
as 2:2019cv00131
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Oniel Jones
Defendant:
Erica Carter and Tony Fann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fann v. Barber et al
as 1:2014cv00302
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Fann
Defendant:
Pamela Barber and B. Andrews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. Williams et al
as 7:2013cv00159
Plaintiff:
LIN EDWARD DAVIS, SR
Defendant:
Frank Williams, Virginia Williams, R FANN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eaton v. Inman et al
as 1:2007cv00058
Plaintiff:
Detina Eaton
Defendant:
Inman, Sharon Smith, Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eaton et al v. Arkansas State Police
as 1:2007cv00045
Plaintiff:
Detina Eaton and Lisa Fann
Defendant:
Arkansas State Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eaton et al v. Maples et al
as 1:2007cv00042
Plaintiff:
Detina Eaton and Lisa Fann
Defendant:
John Maples, Arkansas Department of Correction and LaWanda Dunavion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eaton et al v. Capel et al
as 1:2007cv00043
Plaintiff:
Detina Eaton and Lisa Fann
Defendant:
Maggie Capel and Arkansas Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
