Cases 1 - 10 of 144
Johnson v. Pike County Jail
as 5:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
DeJuan Marquis Johnson
Defendant:
Pike County Jail
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marcus Evans v. Lornetta Smith, et al
as 24-1882
Plaintiff:
Marcus D. Evans
Defendant:
Lornetta Smith, Sergeant, Varner Unit, ADC, Telicia Mothershed and Marquis Taylor, Corporal, Verner Unit, ADC (Originally named as "M Taylor")
Phillips v. Polanco et al
as 7:2024cv02152
Plaintiff:
Marquis Phillips
Defendant:
Edwin Polanco, John Doe ADS L. and Jane Doe ADS L.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marquis Thompson v. Sheyde Perry, et al
as 24-1385
Plaintiff:
MARQUIS THOMPSON
Defendant:
SHEYDE PERRY, TERRY COLLINS and DANIELLE MERRIFIELD
Jordan v. D.O.C. et al
as 3:2024cv00236
Plaintiff:
Victor L. Jordan, Sr.
Defendant:
D.O.C., Jennifer Reis, Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Sifuentes et al
as 4:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Christian Jamal Ellis
Defendant:
Anthony Sifuentes, Marquis Taylor, L Dunlap and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clardy v. The GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
MarQui Clardy, Sr.
Defendant:
The GEO Group, Inc., Iheanwichukwu Esochaghi, D.O., Jacqueline Brown, D.D.S. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Covert v. Taylor et al
as 4:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Harold Moses Covert
Defendant:
Marquis D Taylor and M Demery, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Judge et al
as 5:2023ct03306
Plaintiff:
Marquis D. Williams
Defendant:
Warden Judge and Correctional Officer Bacosa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMPSON v. FORD et al
as 5:2023cv00221
Plaintiff:
MARQUIS RESHAD THOMPSON
Defendant:
TOMMY FORD, JUSTIN BAILEY and GARZA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
