Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Bailey v. Grandy
as 5:2019cv00213
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bailey, III
Defendant:
K Grandy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Holland et al
as 6:2016cv00040
Plaintiff:
John Thomas Bailey
Defendant:
J.C. Holland, Strunck, Rome and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Bailey v. Holland et al
as 6:2016cv00022
Petitioner:
John Thomas Bailey
Respondent:
J.C. Holland, Strunck, Rome and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Joseph Booker v. Julie Beighley, et al
as 12-2898
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH BOOKER
Defendant - Appellee:
JULIE BEIGHLEY, Health Service Administrator, ANDREW NDIFE, Assistant Health Service Administrator, WILLIAM WILSON, Doctor, Medical Doctor - Clinical Director and others
BOOKER v. BEIGHLEY et al
as 2:2012cv00153
Defendant:
THOMAS BAILEY, JULIE BEIGHLEY, CHARLES L. LOCKETT and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH BOOKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
TRAPP v. OLIVER et al
as 2:2012cv00090
Defendant:
Dr. THOMAS BAILEY, Dr. PAUL HARVEY, JOHN C. OLIVER and others
Plaintiff:
HOWARD RAY TRAPP, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mobley v. Bailey et al
as 5:2011cv00243
Plaintiff:
Ray Chris Mobley
Defendant:
Thomas Bailey, W Starling, Jason Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mobley v. Bailey et al
as 5:2011cv00242
Plaintiff:
Ray Chris Mobley
Defendant:
Thomas Bailey and W Starling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Easterling Correctional Facility et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2010cv00475
Plaintiff:
Tyre T. Watkins
Defendant:
Easterling Correctional Facility, Thomas Bailey, Grimmzle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watkins v. Easterling Correctional Facility et al
as 4:2010cv00976
Plaintiff:
Tyre T. Watkins
Defendant:
Easterling Correctional Facility, Thomas Bailey, Grimmzle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
