Cases 11 - 20 of 94
Doranti v. Kniesel et al
as 0:2022cv01964
Plaintiff:
Sarprio Doranti
Defendant:
Terry Kniesel, Ann Linkert, Cory Vargason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. Correct Care Recovery Solutions
as 4:2022cv02043
Plaintiff:
Anthony Shane Martin
Defendant:
Correct Care Recovery Solutions, Erin Gaffney, Brian Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Lindsey v. Kneisel et al
as 0:2022cv00413
Plaintiff:
Dale Allen Lindsey
Defendant:
Terry Kneisel, Scott Benoit, Thane Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Toler v. Semar et al
as 4:2021cv01219
Plaintiff:
Norman Toler
Defendant:
Janine Semar, Chuck Lotz, Dr. Bill Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Payne et al
as 2:2021cv00937
Defendant:
Alex Eisdorfer, Pascal Koulemou, Amber Butt and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Richard Allen, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Rushville Treatment and Detention Facility
as 4:2020cv04201
Plaintiff:
Michael L Anderson
Defendant:
Rushville Treatment and Detention Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CANO v. TSOUKARIS et al
as 2:2020cv11870
Respondent:
CHAD F. WOLF, GUY CIRILLO, WILLIAM J. ANDERSON and others
Petitioner:
MAGDIEL ALEXANDER MORAD CANO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
VIRHAL v. TSOUKARIS et al
as 2:2020cv11734
Respondent:
CHAD F. WOLF, GUY CIRILLO, WILLIAM J. ANDERSON and others
Petitioner:
GUILHERME BONTEMPO VIRHAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Geisler v. Arizona Department of Health Services et al
as 2:2020cv00437
Defendant:
Aaron Bowen, Arizona Department of Health Services, Cara Christ and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Geisler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Windeknecht v. Missouri Dept. of Mental Health et al
as 4:2020cv00293
Defendant:
Missouri Dept. of Mental Health, Kathy Hammond and Bill Anderson
Plaintiff:
Larry E. Windeknecht
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
