Cases 171 - 180 of 830,875
Pelton v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv05044
Plaintiff:
Lisa Anderson Pelton
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Gametronics LLC v. 8Bitdo Technology HK Limited
as 2:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
Gametronics LLC
Defendant:
8Bitdo Technology HK Limited
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Gametronics LLC v. Steelseries ApS
as 2:2024cv00452
Plaintiff:
Gametronics LLC
Defendant:
Steelseries ApS
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Gametronics LLC v. Mad Catz Global Limited
as 2:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Gametronics LLC
Defendant:
Mad Catz Global Limited
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
United States of America v. Tyson Foods, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv01124
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Andrew Cole
Garnishee:
Tyson Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
Moore v. Komatsu America Corp. et al
as 2:2024cv02419
Plaintiff:
Darrin Moore
Defendant:
Komatsu America Corp. and Amber Pugh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Morris et al v. Jupiter Aluminum Corporation et al
as 5:2024cv00110
Plaintiff:
Danika Paige Morris and Joshua Wayne Morris
Defendant:
Jupiter Aluminum Corporation, George Reed and Michael Fair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Shiprack v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv00971
Plaintiff:
Jessie D. Shiprack
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Purcell #319445 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv01455
Petitioner:
Donald Wade Purcell
Respondent:
Ryan F Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
