Cases 1 - 10 of 2,155
Robertson v. Home Depot International, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00625
Plaintiff:
James Robertson
Defendant:
Home Depot International, Inc., Tiffany Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rios v. Walmart, Inc.
as 2:2024cv01090
Plaintiff:
Ana Nataren Rios
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc. and Rickey Robertson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
DAVIS-EL v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2024cv00813
Plaintiff:
BRANDON DAVIS-EL
Defendant:
R. SCOTT ADAMS, DOUGLAS SAMPLE, DEREK ARTIM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robertson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02691
Plaintiff:
Robert Robertson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Robertson et al v. BRP US Inc et al
as 4:2024cv00444
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Robertson and Ellen Robertson
Defendant:
BRP US Inc, Texarkana Tractor Company doing business as Hope Tractor Company and John Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Robertson v. AUROBINDO PHARMA, LTD. et al
as 1:2024cv06207
Plaintiff:
Lionel Robertson
Defendant:
AUROBINDO PHARMA, LTD., AUROLIFE PHARMA, LLC, ACETERIS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stoutamire et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00457
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Conrad Stoutamire, Juan Provencio, Patrick Prudish and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Juan Delgado v. Bloomberg L.P., et al
as 24-11021
Plaintiff:
JUAN JOSE RENDON DELGADO
Defendant:
BLOOMBERG L.P., JORDAN ROBERTSON and MICHAEL RILEY
Robertson et al v. Adams et al
as 4:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Rodney G. Robertson and Angietoria C. Reese
Defendant:
William A. Adams and 47 Trucking LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
