Cases 91 - 100 of 287
Latimer v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2018cv11654
Plaintiff:
Lonzell Latimer
Defendant:
City of Detroit , Ahmed Haidar (#0022), J. Jackson (#0640) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
ROBERSON et al v. CITY OF VINELAND et al
as 1:2017cv13152
Plaintiff:
PAUL M ROBERSON and LORI E KLINE
Defendant:
CITY OF VINELAND, FELIPE LABOY, PAUL R CIFUENTES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv02852
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
Sebring v. Ron Kline,et.al
as 4:2017cv06483
Plaintiff:
Sean Sebring
Defendant:
City of Petaluma , Ron Kline and Alex Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
A.T. v. OLEY VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 5:2017cv04983
Plaintiff:
A.T.
Defendant:
OLEY VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT , RYAN KLINE, BETH STAUFFER KLINE and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
BORZUMATI v. WILSON et al
as 2:2017cv04693
Plaintiff:
LAURIE BORZUMATI
Defendant:
ROBERT WILSON , ANDREW KLINE and SPRING CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sines et al v. Kessler et al
as 3:2017cv00072
Defendant:
Matthew Heimbach, Nationalist Front, Augustus Sol Invictus and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 3, Marissa Blair, John Doe and others
Petitioner:
David Duke, James Hart Stern, Denise Y. Lunsford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Prunty et al v Morgan & Morgan et al
as 2:2017cv00506
Plaintiff:
Robert R. Prunty
Defendant:
Arnold & Itkin LLP , The Meyer Blair Law Firm , Morgan & Morgan LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Gaddy et al v. Flint et al
as 4:2017cv11166
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Gaddy , K.G.1 , K.G.2 and others
Defendant:
City of Flint, Darnell Earley, Howard Croft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
