Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
BUFFALOE et al v. THE CITY OF PLAINFIELD et al
as 2:2012cv03295
Plaintiff:
SHEL S. BUFFALOE , TAURIEN BUFFALOE and LAMAR-RASHAD COOPER
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PLAINFIELD, SHARON ROBINSON-BRIGGS, THE PLAINFIELD POLICE DIVISION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00309
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 USC 2601: Family & Medical Leave Act of 1993
BEVERLEY v. CITY OF PLAINFIELD et al
as 2:2010cv06263
Plaintiff:
CHANNEL BEVERLEY
Defendant:
CITY OF PLAINFIELD, CITY OF PLAINFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT, ALSTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rice v. USA et al
as 3:2010cv01829
Plaintiff:
Gregory M Rice
Defendant:
USA , State of California, LA County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin v. Clement et al
as 6:2009cv03159
Plaintiff:
Angela Franklin
Defendant:
Becky Clement, Tim Collins, Adrinne Clinkscale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-10667
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gwinn et al v. City of North Chicago et al
as 1:2009cv02688
Plaintiff:
Josephine Gwinn, Josephine Gwinn, Daniel Evans and others
Defendant:
City of North Chicago, Officer Carter and Unknown Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
GWYN v. STATE OF INDIANA, CHILD SUPPORT DIVISION et al
as 3:2007cv00169
Plaintiff:
JAMES GWYN
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, CHILD SUPPORT DIVISION and MALCOLM GWINN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
