Cases 11 - 20 of 1,109
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Saldivar et al v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2024cv00442
Plaintiff:
Daniel Saldivar, Michael Wolfe, Zurrell Hernandez and others
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Scott Crow, John or Jane Doe 1-4 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
BROWN v. VANDER ZANDEN et al
as 7:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
ARMAND RASHAD BROWN
Defendant:
TYLER VANDER ZANDEN, CHRIS HICKS and MATTHEW DELACRUZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hicks v. Lexis Nexis
as 2:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Merylynn Hicks
Defendant:
Lexis Nexis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Montgomery v. Daniels et al
as 1:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
Luther Steven Montgomery, Jr.
Defendant:
Officer Cody P. Daniels, Sgt. John Hicks and City Of Mobile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Peters v. Nienhuis et al
as 8:2024cv00893
Plaintiff:
Personal Representat Julia Anne Peters
Defendant:
Sheriff Al Nienhuis, Deputy Sharlene Carr, Corporal Robert Zasimovitch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Starr v. Hicks
as 3:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Carl Starr
Defendant:
Bill Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01669
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Melvin Gibbs v. Navy Federal Credit Union
as 24-1262
Appellant:
M. EUGENE GIBBS and MELVIN EUGENE GIBBS
Defendant:
NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION
Plaintiff:
KRISTOFFER HICKS, LAQUITA OLIVER, CHERELLE JACOB and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
