Cases 11 - 20 of 171
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1061
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv06319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Pittenger v. GIlchristil et al
as 5:2022cv00318
Plaintiff:
Marla Pittenger
Defendant:
Garlin Gilchristil, Juliana Stratton, Howie Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Solomon v. Frederickson, et al
as 22-1426
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS J. SOLOMON
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT C. LAWLESS, NATASHA C. LISMAN, DOUGLAS WOLF and others
Defendant:
CATHOLIC CHURCH OF AMERICA, ST JUDE/ALSAC, VINCENT LECLERC and others
Jaglicic v. Foxx et al
as 1:2022cv03319
Plaintiff:
Eric Jaglicic
Defendant:
Kim Foxx, Kwame Raoul, Lisa Madigan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv02466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ralph Baker v. Michael Wittevrongel, et al
as 22-1088
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RALPH BAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL WITTEVRONGEL, CITY OF UNION TOWNSHIP, SGT. RANDY STRATTON and others
Defendant:
JENNIFER F. BANAAG, YOLANDA CICCONE, FRANCIS P. BARLETTO and others
Frank v. City of Lake Charles et al
as 2:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
Todd Dwayne Frank
Defendant:
City of Lake Charles, Mitch Sawyer, Scott White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv08149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01517
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
