Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Stone v. Davis et al
as 0:2020cv00669
Defendant:
Katz & Stefani, LLC, Andrew Davis and J. Matthew Linstroth
Plaintiff:
Patrick Stone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017cv06454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Davis v. Jefferson Regional Medical Center Preferred Provider Organization et al
as 5:2016cv00262
Plaintiff:
Lee Andrew Davis
Defendant:
Jefferson Regional Medical Center Preferred Provider Organization, Walter Johnson, David Nixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Davies v. Goebel et al
as 2:2015cv13799
Defendant:
Matt Goebel, Paul Kinal, Michael Emmi and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Andrew Davies
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
DAVIS v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2014cv00022
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS and T. MICHAEL WILSON
Plaintiff:
ANDREW DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Rosano v. Adelphi University et al
as 2:2011cv00148
Defendant:
Adelphi University, Carole Bagley Amon, Perry Auerbach and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence R. Rosano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Hot Springs, Arkansas, City of et al
as 6:2010cv06057
Plaintiff:
Andrew Davis
Defendant:
Hot Springs, Arkansas, City of and Edward Davis
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301
Jackson v. City of Hyattsville et al
as 8:2010cv00946
Plaintiff:
Leslie Renee Jackson
Defendant:
City of Hyattsville , Douglas K. Holland , Andrew Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
