Cases 11 - 20 of 83
Woods et al v. Richardson et al
as 2:2022cv00265
Plaintiff:
Myshira Woods and Demetri Woods
Defendant:
Latasha Richardson, Kathryn Malon, B. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00387
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181 Americans
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Leekley-Winslow v. Fairview Health Services
as 0:2019cv00587
Defendant:
Richard B Jones, State of Minnesota, Fairview Health Services and others
Plaintiff:
Colton Leekley-Winslow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. O'Connor et al
as 3:2018cv00314
Defendant:
Ohio Second District Court of Appeals, Chief Justice Maureen O'Connor, State of Ohio State Of Ohio and others
Plaintiff:
Flora B Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Jones v. Kern County et al
as 1:2018cv00823
Plaintiff:
Charles B. Jones
Defendant:
Kern County, Richard Frank and D. Garrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nunez v. Jones et al
as 2:2018cv00375
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Luz A. Nunez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv02219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
INNOVATIVE POLYMER TECHNOLOGIES, LLC et al v. INNOVATION WORKS, INC., PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2017cv01385
Plaintiff:
INNOVATIVE POLYMER TECHNOLOGIES, LLC and DONALD B. JONES
Defendant:
INNOVATION WORKS, INC., PENNSYLVANIA , DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, DENNIS M DAVIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
