Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Ingram v. City of Sacramento et al
as 2:2012cv01686
Plaintiff:
Chaderick A. Ingram
Defendant:
City of Sacramento, County Midcally Indigent Services Program, Social Security Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01529
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Finley-Swanson v. Cass County Bank et al
as 8:2011cv00362
Defendant:
Cass County Bank and Jeffrey B. Swanson
Plaintiff:
LaLinda L. Finley-Swanson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Moral v. Grant County Sheriff, et al
as 10-3295
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLOS MORAL
Defendant - Appellee:
GRANT COUNTY SHERIFF, LANCE BABCOCK, Individually, THOMAS PINNICK, Individually and others
Moral et al v. Grant County Sheriff et al
as 6:2009cv01230
Plaintiff:
Carlos Moral
Defendant:
Grant County Sheriff, Lance Babcock, Thomas Pinnick and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (1) Rent, Lease & Ejectment
Carey et al v. State of California Franchise Tax Board et al
as 2:2007cv02762
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Carey and Leone R. Carey
Defendant:
State of California Franchise Tax Board, Selvi Stanislaus, Tri Counties Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bonnie Cruickshank Wallace v. Mercantile County Bank
as 07-2144
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BONNIE CRUICKSHANK WALLACE, THE WALLACE FAMILY TRUST and HOLLY HALL PUBLICATIONS, INCORPORATED
Defendant - Appellee:
MERCANTILE COUNTY BANK, f/k/a County Banking and Trust Company, RAYMOND HAMM, JR. and GEBHARDT & SMITH, LLP
Oliver v. Carter County Bank et al
as 2:2007cv00108
Plaintiff:
Robert G Oliver
Defendant:
Carter County Bank and Charles Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
