Cases 11 - 20 of 34
McGhee v. Fridlund-Horne
as 3:2019cv08154
Plaintiff:
Joseph Martin McGhee
Defendant:
Elaine Fridlund-Horne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Edwards, et al
as 2:2019cv00044
Defendant:
Unidentified Parties, Stewart Murphy, Oscar Garcia and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Grady et al
as 1:2017cv06775
Plaintiff:
Rahul-Ebenezer Daniels
Defendant:
Joseph Martin Grady , Kathryn Diamond Karayannis , Frederick John Steffen, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McGhee v. Fridlund-Horne et al
as 3:2017cv08152
Plaintiff:
Joseph Martin McGhee
Defendant:
Elaine Fridlund-Horne, Coconino, County of, Coconino County Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Richardson v. Hancq et al
as 1:2017cv00053
Plaintiff:
Lenir Richardson
Defendant:
John Hancq, Carolyn Ney, Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martins v. The County of Nassau et al
as 2:2015cv05120
Defendant:
Sergeant (first name unknown) Brent, Eric J. Dollhausen, State Engineer Peter Heushneider and others
Said Names Being Fictitious, It Being The Intent Of Plaintiffs To Designate Any And All Officers, Me:
John Does #1, 2 and 3
Plaintiff:
Daniel Joseph Martins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Ever Perez v. Richard Gamez, et al
as 14-3539
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EVER PEREZ
Defendant - Appellee:
TROOPER RICHARD GAMEZ, OFFICER ANDREW RICHARD CRONE, BRIAN HUNTER and others
Kelly v. City of Parkersburg et al
as 6:2013cv23260
Plaintiff:
Charles Kelly
Defendant:
City of Parkersburg and Joseph Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Gamez et al
as 1:2013cv01552
Plaintiff:
Ever Perez
Defendant:
Trooper Richard Gamez, Officer Andrew Richard Crone, Brian Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
