Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Koklich v. Yates et al
as 1:2011at00561
Defendant:
James A. Yates, P. Mendoza, Mr. Chamness and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce Koklich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Chaney v. Races and Aces et al
as 3:2011cv00399
Defendant:
1 Unknown Correctional Employees, Kenneth Albarez, Scherell Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Chaney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv11821
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
MacFall v. City of Rochester
as 10-4638
Plaintiff - Appellant:
David S. MacFall, Stephen B. Tortora, Stephen J. Ward and others
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Rochester, David T. Moore, Chief, George Market, Executive Deputy Chief and others
Bernier et al v. Croteau et al
as 3:2010cv01698
Plaintiff:
Rejeanne M Bernier and Hans S. Croteau
Defendant:
Jocelyn G Croteau, ICS Professional Services, Inc, Croteau Living Trust dated 4/6/2005 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROCK v. THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, et al
as 1:2010cv00569
Plaintiff:
JAMES PATRICK BROCK, C.P.
Defendant:
THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, BEVERLY EAVES PURDUE, LIEUTENANT ROBINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dlugokenski et al v. Bristol et al
as 3:2010cv00603
Plaintiff:
Melanie Church Dlugokenski and Donald Dlugokenski
Defendant:
City of Bristol, Arthur J. Ward, John Divenere and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Ricardo Pittman v. Village of Dolton, et al
as 09-4084
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICARDO PITTMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
LAW OFFICE OF ANDERSON J. WARD P.C., ANDERSON J. WARD, LETHEAL N. JOHNSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
