Civil Rights Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 88
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv00252
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv04429
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv02106
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01108
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv04048
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
McDonald et al v. Longley et al
as 1:2019cv00219
Defendant: Randall O Sorrels, David C Kent, Christy Amuny and others
Plaintiff: Tony K McDonald, Joshua B Hammer, Mark S Pulliam and others
Petitioner: Ken Paxton and Goldwater Institute
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv01440
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Undetermined: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00725
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Vladik Bykov v. Steven Rosen, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-35121
Plaintiff - Appellant: VLADIK BYKOV
Defendant - Appellee: STEVEN G. ROSEN, and his marital community, MICHELINE MURPHY, and her marital community, BRIAN ROGERS, and his marital community and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01641
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?