Cases 31 - 40 of 57
Ashmore v. Prus et al
as 1:2013cv02796
Plaintiff:
pty Benjamin J. Ashmore, Sr.
Defendant:
Kelly L. Ashmore, Eric I. Prus, The Chief Judge of the State of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ASHMORE v. BURTON NEIL AND ASSOCIATES, P.C. et al
as 5:2013cv00953
Plaintiff:
PAUL C. ASHMORE
Defendant:
BURTON NEIL AND ASSOCIATES, P.C., MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013at00078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00159
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Simpson v. City of Bloomington et al
as 1:2012cv01430
Plaintiff:
Kevin Simpson
Defendant:
City of Bloomington , Randall McKinley , Tim Stanesa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Bridgette Neal v. Duke Energy
as 12-2237
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRIDGETTE NEAL, a/k/a Bridgette T. Neal
Defendant - Appellee:
DUKE ENERGY, PIKE ELECTRIC, INCORPORATED, SOUTH CAROLINA PUBLIC WORKS and others
CAMPBELL v. MARTINEZ et al
as 2:2012cv05286
Plaintiff:
ROBERT S. CAMPBELL
Defendant:
RAYMOND P. MARTINEZ, GINA M. SINE, MICHAEL SNYDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kinder-Alessio v. Helms-Ashmore et al
as 4:2012cv00493
Plaintiff:
Susan Kinder-Alessio
Defendant:
Sarah Helms-Ashmore, Aaron McCarty, Snow Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. ORS et al
as 6:2012cv01995
Plaintiff:
Bridgette Neal
Defendant:
Duke Energy, Pike Electric, SC Public Works and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
