Cases 31 - 40 of 323
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00372
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Long v. Gourley et al
as 5:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
Saadiq Long
Defendant:
Chief Wade Gourley, Officer FNU Bradley, Officer Dustin Fulton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Galego v. City of Fall River et al
as 1:2022cv12243
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Galego
Defendant:
City of Fall River, Albert F Dupere, Athanasios Parousis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rindal v. Inslee et al
as 2:2022cv01843
Plaintiff:
Steven Michael Rindal
Defendant:
Jay Robert Inslee, Robert Ferguson, Steve Hobbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Boyer, Gregory v. USA Medical & Psychological Staffing et al
as 3:2022cv00723
Plaintiff:
Gregory Boyer
Defendant:
USA Medical & Psychological Staffing, Norman Johnson, Travis Schamber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
REITER et al v. NOEL et al
as 4:2022cv00127
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER REITER and TIFFANY NAPIER
Defendant:
JAMEY NOEL, DONOVAN HARRID, BRADLEY KRAMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Houston v. Lombardo et al
as 2:2022cv01607
Plaintiff:
Matthew Travis Houston
Defendant:
Joe Lombardo, Carolyn Goodman, Miranda M. Du and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
