Cases 31 - 40 of 7,722
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04290
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04293
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Arroyo v. Bih et al
as 2:2024cv01510
Defendant:
Peter Bih, Love Las Vegas Realty and Judie Rock
Plaintiff:
Jeromy Arroyo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00104
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
US v. McCarthy, et al
as 24-1743
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
STEPS TO SOLUTIONS, INC. and PETER MCCARTHY
Grigg v. Greenwood
as 9:2024cv00113
Defendant:
Bowen Greenwood
Plaintiff:
Peter Grigg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Abu Irshaid et al v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv01405
Defendant:
Antony Blinken, Kenneth L. Wainstein, Mason Clutter and others
Plaintiff:
Osama Abu Irshaid and Mustafa Zeidan
Cause Of Action: Objections to Subpoena Issued
Chambers et al v. Sheppard Pratt Health System et al
as 1:2024cv02316
Plaintiff:
Steven Chambers and Kim Chambers
Defendant:
Karen Robertson-Keck, Heidi Kendall, Dr Harsh Trivedi, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Jones et al v. City of Sugar Land, Texas et al
as 4:2024cv02986
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph Bitgood and Richard Peter Jones
Defendant:
DANIEL SWIFT EDMUNDS, Bryce Spencer and City of Sugar Land, Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Peter Sauers v. Oak Property Management LP, et al
as 24-2468
Defendant:
ASHLEY MANAGEMENT CO, MIKE MEISTER, COUNTY BUILDERS and others
Plaintiff:
PETER SAUERS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
