Cases 41 - 50 of 432
Milton Green v. City of St. Louis, et al
as 23-2087
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Milton Green
Defendant / Appellee:
City of St. Louis and Christopher Tanner, Officer, in his individual capacity
Windless v. Avergis et al
as 2:2022cv02754
Plaintiff:
Demetra Elaine Windless
Defendant:
Doctor John Avergis, Doctor Mary Keegan, Lisa Canady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. BOCSE McGuire, Esq. et al
as 1:2023cv01317
Plaintiff:
Jermall Brown
Defendant:
BOCSE McGuire, Esq., Martin / Administrative Agency, Magistrate Sumlin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-606
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
GRUBB v. MEADE et al
as 3:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
DONALD RAY GRUBB
Defendant:
JEFREY MEADE, TANNER HURLEY and ISP TROOPER 9448
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00766
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
R.F. v. Roraback et al
as 6:2023cv06023
Plaintiff:
R. F.
Defendant:
Daniel Roraback, Tanner Campbell, Shawn Hervey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. Copeland et al
as 1:2023cv00353
Plaintiff:
Ralph Brown
Defendant:
Judge Melissa K. Copeland, Amanda Horn, Yolanda A. Tanner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
THORNTON v. BEAVER COUNTY DETECTIVES OFFICE et al
as 2:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
KENNETH E. THORNTON
Defendant:
BEAVER COUNTY DETECTIVES OFFICE, BEAVER COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, BEAVER COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
