Cases 41 - 50 of 152
McCall et al v. Hardwick et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
as 2:2016cv00080
Plaintiff:
Harry L. McCall and Vanies D. McCall
Defendant:
Johnny Hardwick and Mortgage Depot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv02040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cobb County et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv04081
Plaintiff:
DeKalb County, Fulton County, Georgia and Cobb County
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital Inc., Countrywide Warehouse Lending, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
McCoy v. Fisher et al
as 1:2015cv01837
Plaintiff:
Antonio McCoy
Defendant:
Jeffrey B. Fisher, The Fisher Law Group and HSBC Mortgage Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 3410
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv00951
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gill, et al v. Morrison Mahoney LLP, et al
as 15-1385
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
MICHAEL J. GILL
Plaintiff:
THE MORTGAGE SPECIALIST INC
Defendant - Appellee:
MORRISON MAHONEY LLP, NICHOLAS P. ALEXANDER and ERIC E. RENNER
Interested Party:
EDWARD WILLIAM LITTLE, JR. and ANTHONY S. AUGERI
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv02093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Emmanuel Edokobi v. M & M Mortgage Services, Inc.
as 14-2204
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EMMANUEL EDOKOBI
Defendant - Appellee:
M & M MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC., JUAN GONZALEZ and MORTGAGE SPECIALIST, INC.
Myron Bass, et al v. Tom Leatherwood, et al
as 14-6321
Plaintiff:
MYRON BASS
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAREN MOBLEY and LAWRENCE EVERETT REED
Defendant - Appellee:
TOM LEATHERWOOD, Register of Deeds. In official and individual capacity, JOSEPH REVES, Deputy Register of Deeds. In official and individual capacity, MCCURDY & CANDLER, LLC, In official and individual capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
