Civil Rights Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 81
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01289
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Thames v. Kreppel et al
as 1:2013cv11296
Plaintiff: Ruth N. Thames
Defendant: Gary H. Kreppel , The Law Office of Gary H. Kreppel , Donald W. Seeley, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hines v. Capital One Bank (USA) NA
as 1:2013cv00480
Plaintiff: Dashon Martel Hines
Defendant: Capital One Bank (USA) NA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Muhammad v. Capital One Bank, NA
as 1:2013cv01144
Plaintiff: Kareem-Ali Muhammad
Defendant: Capital One Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv00325
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Lagdameo v. Mel S. Harris, LLC et al
as 1:2012cv00929
Plaintiff: Maria Dolores Lagdameo
Defendant: Mel S. Harris, LLC, Forster & Garbus, LLP, LR Credit 17, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv08290
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
FLYTHE v. CAPITAL ONE BANK
as 1:2012cv01013
Plaintiff: MARVIN FLYTHE
Defendant: CAPITAL ONE BANK, CAPITAL ONE SERVICES, INC. and RICHARD D. FAIRBANKS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
United States of America v. Capital One, N.A. et al
as 1:2012cv00828
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Capital One, N.A. and Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
Cause Of Action: 50 U.S.C. § 0501
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-1897
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?