Cases 51 - 60 of 1,157
Matthew Miller v. Dan Wilcot, et al
as 23-3623
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Matthew W. Miller
Defendant / Appellee:
Dan Wilcot, William K. Busch, Lynn Miller and others
Davis v. Logan et al
as 4:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Robert Davis
Defendant:
Officer Brandon Logan, Officer William Snyder, Capt. Wes Wallace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boersma v. Armstrong
as 6:2023cv01782
Plaintiff:
Heather Lynn Boersma
Defendant:
Sean Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00840
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Williams v. Nexstar Media Group et al
as 1:2023cv00456
Plaintiff:
Wendy M. Williams
Defendant:
Nexstar Media Group, Perry Sooks, Geoff Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Agness McCurry v. Travis McDonough, et al
as 23-6055
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AGNESS MCCURRY
Defendant / Appellee:
TRAVIS RANDALL MCDONOUGH, Judge, KENNY W. ARMSTRONG, Judge, ANDY D. BENNETT, Judge and others
Armstrong-Bey v. United States of America et al
as 4:2023cv01364
Plaintiff:
Charles Jesse Armstrong-Bey
Defendant:
United States of America, Housing Urban Development and Saint Andrews Real Estate Management
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCurry v. McDonough et al
as 3:2023cv00367
Plaintiff:
Agness McCurry
Defendant:
Travis McDonough, Kenny Armstrong, Andy Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv03832
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Act of 1993
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv04289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
