Cases 51 - 60 of 3,066
Austin v. Kemper Independence Insurance Company (2167877)
as 3:2024cv01120
Plaintiff:
George Jarvis Austin
Defendant:
Kemper Independence Insurance Company (2167877), Diane Kaneyuki, Kevork Artinian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Baker v. McDonough
as 3:2024cv00379
Plaintiff:
Tanycia Baker
Defendant:
Denis R McDonough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Baker v. Avenue5 Residential
as 2:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Justin Baker
Defendant:
Avenue5 Residential
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Satterwhite v. Baker et al
as 5:2024cv00699
Plaintiff:
DaCorey Satterwhite
Defendant:
Dr. Hyon Chu Yi Baker, Becket DiGregio, Dr. Michele Leblue Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. The State of North Carolina et al
as 1:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Andrew D. Anderson
Defendant:
The State of North Carolina, The Office of the Governor of North Carolina, Roy Cooper, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baker v. Wroe et al
as 2:2024cv10227
Plaintiff:
Louis Baker
Defendant:
Stephen Wroe, Lauren Zyrowski, Hania Maqbool and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
