Cases 51 - 60 of 143
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00296
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00614
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hartley v. Collins et al
as 2:2017cv01091
Plaintiff:
Pam Hartley
Defendant:
Jamarkus Collins, Katrina Hallam, Sasha Day and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv02375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv11327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Swars v. Champlin et al
as 2:2017cv06748
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Swars
Defendant:
Stephen Champlin , S Champlin Properties III LLC , Delery Comarda Realtors, LLC and others
Counter_claimant:
S Champlin Properties III LLC and Stephen Champlin
Counter_defendant:
Jennifer Swars
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
MICKMAN v. SALAMAN, GRAYSON AND HENRY et al
as 2:2017cv02452
Plaintiff:
ELAINE MICKMAN
Defendant:
SALAMAN, GRAYSON AND HENRY, CLIFFORD B. COHN and DREW SALAMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKinneya v. Connecticut
as 3:2017cv00397
Plaintiff:
Alana-Jane:' McKinney
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, John F. Dickun, Jeffrey M. Knickerbocker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-517
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Guglielmo v. Montgomery County, Ohio and the Montgomery County Board of Commissioners et al
as 3:2017cv00006
Plaintiff:
Joseph Guglielmo
Defendant:
Montgomery County, Ohio and the Montgomery County Board of Commissioners, Phil Plummer, Matthew Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
