Cases 51 - 60 of 928
Cobble v. Beshear et al
as 3:2023cv00576
Plaintiff:
Daniel Cobble
Defendant:
Andy Beshear, Bobbie Holsclaw, David James and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Perez v. City of San Antonio
as 23-50746
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Gary Perez and Matilde Torres
Defendant / Appellee:
City of San Antonio
Amicus Curiae:
International Council of Thirteen Grandmothers and Carol Logan
Rice v. Pittmon et al
as 4:2023cv03968
Plaintiff:
Lori Rice
Defendant:
Doyle Logan Pittmon and Montgomery County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LOGAN v. LAMONT et al
as 3:2023cv21174
Plaintiff:
MARY BASILE LOGAN
Defendant:
NED LAMONT, JOHN CARNEY, CHARLIE BAKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FLOYD v. WALDO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2023cv00379
Plaintiff:
SEAN J FLOYD
Defendant:
WALDO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, CODY LAITE, CASEY ASHEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Logan, et al v. Antaya, et al
as 23-1808
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LINDA A. LOGAN and EPHRAIM E. LOGAN
Defendant / Appellee:
HEATHER ANTAYA and LYNNE TOWNSEND, Senior Property Compliance Manager
Bond et al v. Skillman et al
as 6:2023cv00059
Plaintiff:
Crystal Bond and Douglas Bond
Defendant:
Logan Skillman, Stephen Rippy, John Glerum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Yosick v. Murchinson et al
as 2:2023cv02016
Plaintiff:
Brent Christopher Yosick
Defendant:
Sydnee Murchinson, Logan Kassanbrock, Chantel Madsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Logan et al v. Oklahoma City Police Department et al
as 5:2023cv00804
Plaintiff:
El Cruz Logan
Defendant:
Oklahoma City Police Department, Jason Hodges, Daniel Ponder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
