Cases 61 - 70 of 119
Williams v. Paris, City of et al
as 5:2015cv00108
Plaintiff:
Phyllis Williams
Defendant:
City of Paris , David Thompson and Jon L. Humphries
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Martinez v. Smith et al
as 4:2015cv00117
Plaintiff:
Andres Martinez
Defendant:
Brook Smith and Michael Humphries
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Link v. USA et al
as 1:2015cv00599
Plaintiff:
Darrell Allen Link
Defendant:
USA, State of Texas, The, County of Sherman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2014cv01997
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
William Morse, et al v. Ozark County, Missouri, et al
as 14-3805
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William G. Morse and Tanya L. Morse
Defendant - Appellee:
Ozark County, Missouri, Gareth Heidi, Betty Heidi and others
Morse et al v. County of Ozark, Missouri et al
as 6:2014cv03348
Plaintiff:
William G. Morse and Tanya L. Morse
Defendant:
County of Ozark, Missouri, Gareth Heidi, Betty Heidi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Ryan McFadyen v. Linwood Wilson
as 14-1499
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RYAN MCFADYEN, MATTHEW WILSON and BRECK ARCHER
Defendant - Appellant:
LINWOOD WILSON
Defendant:
DUKE UNIVERSITY, DUKE UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, AARON GRAVES and others
BLACK et al v. YOUNGUE et al
as 2:2014cv00505
Plaintiff:
DEBRA BLACK and EARL BLACK
Defendant:
EUGENE YOUNGUE and DAVID HUMPHRIES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McHugh v. Pima, County of et al
as 4:2014cv01992
Plaintiff:
Michael McHugh
Defendant:
Pima, County of , Pima County Sheriff's Department, Clarence Dupnik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Castillo, et al v. Day, et al
as 14-6050
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CRYSTAL CASTILLO, LISA GARELL, ANGELA GAYTAN and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLOTTE DAY
Defendant:
ANTHONY BOBELU, in his individual capacity, AKA Tony Bobelu, RUSSELL HUMPHRIES, in his individual capacity, BUD DOLAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
