Cases 81 - 90 of 1,303
Hughes v. University Hospitals et al.
as 1:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Justin Hughes
Defendant:
University Hospitals, Governor Mike DeWine, Dr. Anupam Jha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
TATUM v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
THOMAS TATUM
Defendant:
JOSEPH BIDEN, METROPOLITAN POLICE, DANIEL THAU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cotto, et al v. Campbell, et al
as 23-2069
Plaintiff:
STACY FOSTER, On behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, JAMIE KIMBALL, On behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, JONATHAN RILEY, On behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, ANDREA J. CAMPBELL, Attorney General, TIMOTHY SHUGRUE, Berkshire County District Attorney and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv02513
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Riley et al v. Halliburton et al
as 2:2023cv00163
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Riley and Belinda Riley
Defendant:
Avery Halliburton, William Carroll and Susan Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Province v. Loll et al
as 1:2023cv08973
Plaintiff:
Wyndia Province
Defendant:
Sabrina Loll, Vasilios Stotis, Sabrina Cohen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00786
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09886
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
