Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 580
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00600
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hadnot v. Lufkin ISD et al
as 1:2024cv00164
Plaintiff: Mickey Hadnot
Defendant: Lufkin ISD, Lynn Torres, Jay Jost and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01953
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11042
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Riley v. Clayton County, Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv01567
Plaintiff: Cordero Riley
Defendant: Clayton County, Georgia, Jeffrey Turner, Alieka Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Estate of Lane Caviness, et al v. Atlas Air, Inc., et al
as 24-11033
Plaintiff: ESTATE OF LANE CAVINESS, PATRICK AKERLUND, MICHAEL ALZATI and others
Defendant: ATLAS AIR, INC. and FLIGHT SERVICES INTERNATIONAL, LLC
Not Yet Classified: SERVICE
Tracy Sanders, et al v. Reid Forrester, et al
as 24-1699
Plaintiff: Tracy L. Sanders and David Lee Sanders
Defendant: Reid K. Forrester, in his individual capacity, Shalonn K. Curls, in her individual capacity, Rodney J. Campbell, in his individual capacity and others
Tony Forrester v. Carlos Nunez
as 24-1273
Plaintiff: TONY GENE FORRESTER
Defendant: CARLOS NUNEZ
Tony Forrester v. Officer Kemp
as 24-1276
Plaintiff: TONY GENE FORRESTER
Defendant: OFFICER KEMP, VICTORIA ANN LATHAM and ANDREA MITCHELL
Frances Enyart et al v. County of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2024cv00526
Plaintiff: Frances Enyart, Gregory Enyart and A. E.
Defendant: County of San Bernardino, Angel Alvarado, Andres Zavala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?