Cases 1 - 10 of 142
Aker v. City of Dayton et al
as 2:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Octavian Aker
Defendant:
City of Dayton and Cassie Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Amity Dimock v. City of Brooklyn Center, et al
as 24-1728
Plaintiff:
Amity Dimock, Trustee for the Heirs and Next of Kin of Kobe Dimock-Heisler
Defendant:
City of Brooklyn Center, Brandon Akers, in their individual and official capacities, Steve Holt, in their individual and official capacities and others
Benshoof et al v. City of Shoreline et al
as 2:2024cv00343
Plaintiff:
Kurt A Benshoof, Briana D Gage and Kurt Benshoof
Defendant:
City of Shoreline, King County, Town & Country Markets and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reilly v. Town of Lexington et al
as 1:2024cv10415
Plaintiff:
Carol Reilly
Defendant:
Town of Lexington, Officer Steve Papia, Officer Joseph Carruthers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Newton v. Akers
as 4:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Sye Newton
Defendant:
Cordt Cullen Akers d/b/a The Akers Firm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00844
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00836
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01067
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
